Solidity MINT ERC20

External question — Ethereum Stack Exchange Author: Crazy Original post: https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/112421 License: CC BY-SA 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed. I will try to be brief in my doubt, below I am putting a model of a Smart Contract referring to a currency that I am creating for my game. // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity >=0.4.22 <0.9.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC20Burnable.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/Pausable.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/AccessControl.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol"; contract SATOKCoin is ERC20, ERC20Burnable, Pausable, AccessControl, Ownable { using SafeMath for uint256; bytes32 public constant PAUSER_ROLE = keccak256("PAUSER_ROLE"); bytes32 public constant MINTER_ROLE = keccak256("MINTER_ROLE"); constructor() ERC20("TOK COIN", "TOK") { _setupRole(DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE, msg.sender); _setupRole(PAUSER_ROLE, msg.sender); _mint(msg.sender, 100000 * 10 ** decimals()); _setupRole(MINTER_ROLE, msg.sender); } function pause() public onlyRole(PAUSER_ROLE) { _pause(); } function unpause() public onlyRole(PAUSER_ROLE) { _unpause(); } function mint(address to, uint256 amount) public onlyRole(MINTER_ROLE) { _mint(to, amount); } function _beforeTokenTransfer(address from, address to, uint256 amount) internal whenNotPaused override { super._beforeTokenTransfer(from, to, amount); } } The currency will be used in a web game, and my doubts are as follows... Player actions will result in rewards, these rewards will be "virtually" saved in my database (off-chain). At some point, the player will be able to redeem the values ​​he has, at that moment I need to transfer to him the value X of my token (code above), below the doubts. first doubt the easiest way is to use the "mint" option and thus mint new coins directly for the calling player (msg.sender)? Or Use the "transfer" option, and thus transfer the value you have in the contract to the player's wallet (msg.sender)? second doubt Regarding security, how can I ensure that at the time of transferring the token the value that was passed in the function is the same one that the player has in my database (off-chain)? At this point I identified that there is Oracle, but I couldn't find a way and I don't know if there is a possibility of having a query in oracle before performing the transfer of the token to the player's wallet, is this possible? and if it is possible someone could give me an example in practice of a code that would have? Thanks for help.

External answer — Ethereum Stack Exchange Author: Ismael Original post: https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/a/112578 License: CC BY-SA 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed. To accomplish these properties you could generate off-chain a signature of the amount and recipient's address. Then the contract will verify the signature is valid before performing the mint.

External answer — Ethereum Stack Exchange Author: rodrigosimoesrosa Original post: https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/a/119269 License: CC BY-SA 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed. @Crazy, using the technique brought by @Ismael, I created one, however I'm still in doubt about any possible security issues on that: Using ECDSA to verify a signature inside smart contract

External answer — Ethereum Stack Exchange Author: Ashraile Original post: https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/a/156546 License: CC BY-SA 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed. 1st doubt: Usually it's done by transferring tokens from the owner / contract address to msg.sender . 2nd doubt: You may need to use a Merkle Tree. However you may just be able to store the value within the contract itself, and simply prevent that transfer until certain conditions are met. Unless you have need of absolute time precision within your contract, you can write something like: struct StoredValue { uint value; uint[] rewards; address to; } mapping(address => uint) internal timestamps; mapping(address => StoredValue) StoredValues; StoredValue[] arrayOfStoredValues; function setTimestamp(uint time, address account_to_lock) internal { timestamps[account_to_lock] = block.timestamp + time; } at transfer: if (timestamps[address] != 0) { require(block.timestamp > timestamps[address], "You cannot yet transfer tokens"); // transfer your token with stored value /* StoredValue memory values = arrayOfStoredValues[3]; transfer(msg.sender, values.to, values.value); timestamps[address] = 0; // reset timestamp */ }