Why did Newton choose to devalue silver with respect to gold and (effectively) create the gold standard?
Why did Newton choose to devalue silver with respect to gold and (effectively) create the gold standard?
Loading saved threads...
Alexandar Ruño · External communityPost link
External question — Economics Stack Exchange
Author: Alexandar Ruño
Original post: https://economics.stackexchange.com/questions/57647
License: CC BY-SA 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed.
This is a question of economic history, specifically about one specific event that caused the British to adopt the
gold standard
.
Reading about the gold standard one often encounters statements like this.
Great Britain accidentally adopted a de facto gold standard in 1717 when Sir Isaac Newton, then-master of the Royal Mint, set the exchange rate of silver to gold too low, thus causing silver coins to go out of circulation.
To my understanding what Newton did was to change the exchange rate (of the
Bi-metallic
system) between gold and silver from 1:20 to 1:21 i.e. making one gold guinea coin no longer equal to 20 silver shillings but 21 shillings instead. This gave gold a slight
edge
compared to silver so most people started buying gold instead of silver effectively creating the gold standard.
The question is why did he do this?
I'm looking for a historical reference, a book, or an article that deals with this question. Is it even known, or can his reasoning be somehow extrapolated from the historical records that we have?
There are several explanations I managed to find online
He performed chemical experiments on silver and gold and based on some
objective
physical properties of mass, malleability, ductility etc. decided that the right ratio is 1:21
Britain and Europe in general had a trade deficit with China which made it beneficial because the Chinese used a copper-silver bimetallic system which effectively allowed the British to sell the Chinese their silver on their market and to substitute it with gold because of the
Brazilian gold rush
.
some combination of the two or some other deeper reason...
Again, I would like to find a serious article or book that deals with the explanation of the (effective) adoption of the gold standard. Everything I have is a combination of Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica articles and an elementary ability to string facts together.
Quote
Report
Stephen Webb Hansen · External communityPost link
External answer — Economics Stack Exchange
Author: Stephen Webb Hansen
Original post: https://economics.stackexchange.com/a/58757
License: CC BY-SA 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed.
To my knowledge, one major reason was to expel the counterfeit "silver" coins out of the economy (and/or to discourage the minting of counterfeit silver coins), which Newton estimated to be around 20% of all silver coins in circulation. Here's a good article on the topic:
https://www.herobullion.com/isaac-newton-saved-british-coinage/
Quote
Report
1muflon1 · External communityPost link
External answer — Economics Stack Exchange
Author: 1muflon1
Original post: https://economics.stackexchange.com/a/58759
License: CC BY-SA 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed.
It is generally accepted that it was a miscalculation. He was working with faulty data because in other countries gold was bit overvalued relative to unique situation in Britain (see
Fay 1935
). He was however, concerned with accuracy only based on the evidence.
There wasn't any deeper reason behind it as you suggest. Historical evidence suggests that Newton attempted to get the correct exchange, didn't got it right on the first try and when silver started to leave country there was no political willingness to correct it and eventually it accidentally pushed UK into gold standard. There is no evidence that this was intentional on Newton's part. In fact Fay mentions he attempted to correct it but didn't managed so and even though first it raised concerns in some circles, mercantilist factions within UK did favor gold, even though Newton was master of the mint he didn't had complete free hand to just do whatever he wanted.
Quote
Report
Lisa T · External communityPost link
External answer — Economics Stack Exchange
Author: Lisa T
Original post: https://economics.stackexchange.com/a/60627
License: CC BY-SA 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed.
Newton set the guinea at 21 shillings in 1717 to align England’s gold–silver ratio with continental markets and curb coin export.
This rate undervalued silver, causing it to vanish from circulation and leaving gold dominant — unintentionally creating a de facto gold standard.
Quote
Report
Post Reply
Quoted from Forex.com.bd-Editorial External answer — Economics Stack Exchange Author: 1muflon1 Source score (net votes, not local likes): 1 Original post: https://economics.stackexchange.com/a/58759 License: CC BY-SA 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed. It is generally accepted that it was a miscalculation. He was working with faulty data because in other countries gold was bit overvalued relative to unique situation in Britain (see Fay 1935 ). He was however, concerned with accuracy only based on the evidence. There wasn't any deeper reason behind it as you suggest. Historical evidence suggests that Newton attempted to get the correct exchange, didn't got it right on the first try and when silver started to leave country there was no political willingness to correct it and eventually it accidentally pushed UK into gold standard. There is no evidence that this was intentional on Newton's part. In fact Fay mentions he attempted to correct it but didn't managed so and even though first it raised concerns in some circles, mercantilist factions within UK did favor gold, even though Newton was master of the mint he didn't had complete free hand to just do whatever he wanted.
Checking account access…