What kind of “contract engineering” roles could emerge from current Bitcoin Script primitives?
What kind of “contract engineering” roles could emerge from current Bitcoin Script primitives?
Loading saved threads...
Aaron Zhang · External communityPost link
External question — Bitcoin Stack Exchange
Author: Aaron Zhang
Original post: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/130627
License: CC BY-SA 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed.
I’ve been testing simple opcode combinations — CHECKSIG, CSFS, IK+CSFS....trying to get a feel for what each one actually binds.
It feels like the challenge is less about expressiveness, and more about choosing the right kind of binding.
I’m wondering:
Do developers see this as its own discipline — not Ethereum-style contracts, but something like designing Bitcoin’s contracts within constraints?
Does that map to a distinct kind of engineering role over time?
Or is this still just considered script work?
Quote
Report
Post Reply
Quoted from Forex.com.bd-Editorial External question — Bitcoin Stack Exchange Author: Aaron Zhang Source score (net votes, not local likes): 0 Original post: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/130627 License: CC BY-SA 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed. I’ve been testing simple opcode combinations — CHECKSIG, CSFS, IK+CSFS....trying to get a feel for what each one actually binds. It feels like the challenge is less about expressiveness, and more about choosing the right kind of binding. I’m wondering: Do developers see this as its own discipline — not Ethereum-style contracts, but something like designing Bitcoin’s contracts within constraints? Does that map to a distinct kind of engineering role over time? Or is this still just considered script work?
Checking account access…