What are the steps to perform properly a risk factor analysis on a portfolio?
What are the steps to perform properly a risk factor analysis on a portfolio?
Loading saved threads...
SRKX · External communityPost link
External question — Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange
Author: SRKX
Original post: https://quant.stackexchange.com/questions/3552
License: CC BY-SA 3.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed.
I have been asked to perform a factor analysis on a given portfolio, assume it's a Swiss portfolio in CHF.
First step
, I chose which factors I would like to see in my analysis.
The first factors I would add are components of the portfolio (and used the hedged performance)
Performance of a global equity index
Performance of a global fixed income index
Performance of gold
Performance of a commodity index
Then I would like to have the forex factors so I add
EURCHF performance
USDCHF performance
Finally, I would like to have some macro-economics indicators:
Change in GDP of Switzerland
Inflation Rate
Unemployment rate.
For example.
Si I gave a large bunch of factors, my first question is, some time series have larger values in magnitude than others and I was wondering whether I should normalize them before going further?
Do you think it makes sense to split "pure" stock performance and forex components?
Second Step
I will eventually be looking to do the following:
$$Y_t = \alpha + \sum_{i=1}^k \beta_i {F_i}_t + \varepsilon_t$$
where $F_i, \quad 0<i \leq k$ is the i-th factor and $y_t$ is the return of the portfolio at time $t$.
The problem is that for this to be meaningful we need the different $F_i$ to be independent.
Is there a general accepted method in our field to use to get a set of independent factors? (I asked the question
here
but I could not come up with a straight answer).
Third step
Once this filter is done we have $l\leq k$ independent factors. I was thinking about running the regression over the remaining $l$ factors, and then look at their p-values to see which ones are significant and hence I want to keep. Is there a better usually used in factor analysis?
Quote
Report
Ram Ahluwalia · External communityPost link
External answer — Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange
Author: Ram Ahluwalia
Original post: https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/3554
License: CC BY-SA 3.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed.
The regression requires orthogonalization of factors. However, we need to maintain the interpretation of factors (so PCA and Factor Analysis are out). Also, we could apply an iterative method (indeed this is very common practice) but this will bias the factor loadings on the sequence of factors.
Best approach is that of Klein and Chow in their paper
Orthogonalized Equity Risk Premia and Systematic Risk Decomposition
. They use this a methodology from Schweinler and Wigner (1970) in the quantum chemistry wavelet literature which relies on nothing more fancy than an eigenvector decomposition. As they describe:
This distinctive characteristic is essential for a proper
decomposition, as we need to treat all the factors on an equal
footing. Thus, the
orthogonal transformation of all factors has to be
conducted jointly and simultaneously
.
We choose the symmetric form of orthogonalization, which minimizes the overall difference between the original and the
orthogonal vectors, thus maximizing the resemblance between the two
sets of data.
We
apply it to the demeaned original factors
, which ensures that the
resulting vectors are not only mathematically orthogonal, but also
uncorrelated.
They have a nice case-study applying the approach to the original Fama-French paper. I have applied their method to a mix of fundamental and economic factors for return and risk decomposition and confirm that despite the orthogonalization, the pre and post correlation of the variables are high.
Left unstated in your question is how you will identify the economic factor returns. You might be taking the economic factor time-series as is (which essentially does not distinguish between expectations and surprise), or taking the residuals of an economic factor time-series after applying an AR(1) or similar time-series model (common), or you might produce the economic factor returns as an output of a cross-sectional regression. There is a bit of art and science in that step but it's something you want to at least consider.
Quote
Report
Post Reply
Quoted from Forex.com.bd-Editorial External answer — Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange Author: Ram Ahluwalia Source score (net votes, not local likes): 13 Original post: https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/3554 License: CC BY-SA 3.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed. The regression requires orthogonalization of factors. However, we need to maintain the interpretation of factors (so PCA and Factor Analysis are out). Also, we could apply an iterative method (indeed this is very common practice) but this will bias the factor loadings on the sequence of factors. Best approach is that of Klein and Chow in their paper Orthogonalized Equity Risk Premia and Systematic Risk Decomposition . They use this a methodology from Schweinler and Wigner (1970) in the quantum chemistry wavelet literature which relies on nothing more fancy than an eigenvector decomposition. As they describe: This distinctive characteristic is essential for a proper decomposition, as we need to treat all the factors on an equal footing. Thus, the orthogonal transformation of all factors has to be conducted jointly and simultaneously . We choose the symmetric form of orthogonalization, which minimizes the overall difference between the original and the orthogonal vectors, thus maximizing the resemblance between the two sets of data. We apply it to the demeaned original factors , which ensures that the resulting vectors are not only mathematically orthogonal, but also uncorrelated. They have a nice case-study applying the approach to the original Fama-French paper. I have applied their method to a mix of fundamental and economic factors for return and risk decomposition and confirm that despite the orthogonalization, the pre and post correlation of the variables are high. Left unstated in your question is how you will identify the economic factor returns. You might be taking the economic factor time-series as is (which essentially does not distinguish between expectations and surprise), or taking the residuals of an economic factor time-series after applying an AR(1) or similar time-series model (common), or you might produce the economic factor returns as an output of a cross-sectional regression. There is a bit of art and science in that step but it's something you want to at least consider.
Checking account access…