Is it a good idea to spread investments over multiple stockbrokers?
Is it a good idea to spread investments over multiple stockbrokers?
Loading saved threads...
DBPaul · External communityPost link
External question — Personal Finance Stack Exchange
Author: DBPaul
Original post: https://money.stackexchange.com/questions/155872
License: CC BY-SA 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed.
In the UK, I believe stock brokers are required to use nominee accounts to hold shares on behalf of individual investors, so that if the stock broker were to collapse the investments themselves are safe.
But in cases of fraudulent accounting or recklessness (i.e.
Pritchard Stockbrokers
), it is still possible to lose money when a stockbroker fails.
Do investors with large portfolios (6 or 7 figures or more) spread investments over multiple stockbrokers to mitigate this risk?
What about the actual funds?
Is it a bad idea to invest large amounts in funds provided by a single company
, e.g. Vanguard? Could you lose you money if a fund management company like this goes bankrupt?
Quote
Report
Steve Kidd · External communityPost link
External answer — Personal Finance Stack Exchange
Author: Steve Kidd
Original post: https://money.stackexchange.com/a/155886
License: CC BY-SA 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed.
It is possible to lose money if a UK stockbroker fails although there is some protection against this via the
FSCS
. It used to be £50,000 but changed in April 2019 to £85,000 per person per firm. Not much use if you happen to have 7 digits worth of assets.
Fraud at the brokerage could mean your money never reaches the safety of the custodian. Fraud at the custodian could also mean funds go missing.
These are both supposed to be unlikely events and there are regulators to minimise that risk. But it still exists.
For this reason, I personally hold my assets via two different brokers. However, I have no idea what others do. And of course, using two brokers only reduces the risk, it doesn't eliminate it. Plus it increases costs.
The same surely applies for funds. Put all your eggs in one basket and you are at risk (albeit a tiny one) of losing them all.
Quote
Report
Post Reply
Quoted from Forex.com.bd-Editorial External question — Personal Finance Stack Exchange Author: DBPaul Source score (net votes, not local likes): 3 Original post: https://money.stackexchange.com/questions/155872 License: CC BY-SA 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed. In the UK, I believe stock brokers are required to use nominee accounts to hold shares on behalf of individual investors, so that if the stock broker were to collapse the investments themselves are safe. But in cases of fraudulent accounting or recklessness (i.e. Pritchard Stockbrokers ), it is still possible to lose money when a stockbroker fails. Do investors with large portfolios (6 or 7 figures or more) spread investments over multiple stockbrokers to mitigate this risk? What about the actual funds? Is it a bad idea to invest large amounts in funds provided by a single company , e.g. Vanguard? Could you lose you money if a fund management company like this goes bankrupt?
Checking account access…