Inverse Mills ratio in system of equations

Inverse Mills ratio in system of equations

Manage alerts

Loading saved threads...

research111 · External communityPost link
External question — Cross Validated Stack Exchange Author: research111 Original post: https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/228868 License: CC BY-SA 3.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed. I have been stuck on the following selection/endogeneity problem for a while: I have a panel dataset with 1.000 products becoming fair trade products, all at very different times between 2010 and 2014. For each product, I have weekly sales data for 6 months before they become fair trade up to 1 year after they become fair trade. In step 1, I estimated the effect of becoming fair trade using a (step) dummy variable that becomes 1 from the week onwards they become fair trade using OLS for each product individually . In step 2, I regress the coefficients from the step dummy on about 12 variables (moderaters). I use a 2 step procedure, because 12 interaction effects are not possible to estimate in the same equation due to multicollinearity. The problem, however, is that brands self-select into joining fair trade or not. I do have data on all products, including those who did not become fair trade. In short, my question is: Can I estimate 1 (panel?) selection equation across time across products, and include the same single inverse Mills ratio in each product equation seperately? Or are there other, better approaches to my problem?
Quote
Report
asdir · External communityPost link
External answer — Cross Validated Stack Exchange Author: asdir Original post: https://stats.stackexchange.com/a/231321 License: CC BY-SA 3.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed. To answer your question: No, you cannot use the IMR from a pooled selection equation in the regression in an outcome equation with just a subset of the pooled observations. The outcome equation has to contain all observations, except for those cases that do not fulfill your selection criterion. However, I think might be a much simpler resolution to your situation: If the multicollinearity you are concerned about his multicollinearity between the interaction term and its components, you could try standardizing your variables, as suggested here . Hope that helps.
Quote
Report

Post Reply

Quoted from Forex.com.bd-Editorial External answer — Cross Validated Stack Exchange Author: asdir Source score (net votes, not local likes): 0 Original post: https://stats.stackexchange.com/a/231321 License: CC BY-SA 3.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Adaptation: HTML converted to plain text; contact email addresses removed. To answer your question: No, you cannot use the IMR from a pooled selection equation in the regression in an outcome equation with just a subset of the pooled observations. The outcome equation has to contain all observations, except for those cases that do not fulfill your selection criterion. However, I think might be a much simpler resolution to your situation: If the multicollinearity you are concerned about his multicollinearity between the interaction term and its components, you could try standardizing your variables, as suggested here . Hope that helps.

Cancel quote

Checking account access…